River of Blessings International Ministries
  • Home
  • EVENTS
  • BOOKS
    • Michael Van Vlymen Libros en Español
    • Michael Van Vlymen Livros em português
    • Michael Van Vlymen Livres en Français
    • Michael Van Vlymen Libri in italiano
    • Michael Van Vlymen Boeken in het Nederlands
    • マイケル・ヴァン・ヴライメン 日本語の本
    • Майкъл Ван Влаемен, Българската книга.
    • 迈克尔-范弗利门中文书籍
    • Other Books
    • VIDEO
  • Contact
    • TESTIMONIES
    • Blog
    • ABOUT US
  • GIVING
                                                                                 MIKE'S BLOG
God continually speaks to us. That's what happens when you have a relationship with someone. They talk to you. In close relationships they reveal their heart to you. God wants to reveal His heart to us. The Lord wants to share His secrets with those He loves. 

​I always encourage people to journal what God speaks to you and what He shows you. Give honor to that relationship and He will reveal to you even more. Write the vision.

Universalism

8/16/2024

9 Comments

 
Picture
My first encounter with universalism, although I didn't recognize it by that name at the time, happened during a conversation with a New Age practitioner while I was sharing the gospel message of Jesus Christ. As I explained to him that all have sinned and fall short of God’s glory, but the good news is that Jesus paid the price for our sins, offering a free gift of salvation and a relationship with God, along with eternal life in Heaven, he became visibly upset. His face contorted with rage, and he nearly shook as he spoke.
 
"I won't believe in a God who forces people to receive Jesus or go to hell," he spat out angrily. "That is not love." His frustration was palpable as he fired off questions at me. "What about all the indigenous people living in jungles who have never even heard of Jesus? What about people in foreign countries who don't know Him? How can that be fair? I don’t see how that can be fair!” His words were filled with indignation, anger and disbelief. He couldn't reconcile the concept of a loving God with what he perceived as arbitrary rules and eternal punishment.
 
I tried to explain the loving sacrifice that Jesus made for us, how it was an act of profound love, not vengeance. But because he couldn't see how it was fair or just; he rejected the Jesus I was telling him about—my Jesus. He spoke of his many spiritual experiences, where spiritual counselors would visit him, affirming that his belief was correct and everyone was okay, that all people would go to heaven regardless of their beliefs. These experiences with these spiritual beings validated his belief that salvation through Jesus was unnecessary.
 
Throughout our conversation, his anger at my biblical perspective was striking. He accused me of being uncaring, suggesting that I wanted people to go to hell simply because I believed in the necessity of accepting Jesus as Savior. It was as if my personal belief, rooted in Scripture, was directly responsible for the eternal fate of others. He saw my faith not as an expression of love, but as an endorsement of an angry, vengeful God eager to send people to hell for His own pleasure.
 
Despite his anger, I continued to help him in many ways over the years, more so than his friends who shared his beliefs. I wanted to show him that I cared for him, even though he hated my God and viewed me as an uncaring, hate-filled person.
 
Years later, I began to encounter similar sentiments within the church. Friends and fellow believers questioned how I could be so "hateful" as to insist on the necessity of accepting Jesus for salvation. They echoed the New Age sentiments I had heard before, which had been influenced by Eastern mysticism and esoteric spirituality. Which now had now subtly crept into the church. This blending of beliefs created a form of spiritual relativism that diluted or subverted the gospel's core message.
 
It was disheartening to see how the powerful truth of the gospel was being overshadowed by these influences. People who once stood firm in the faith were now swayed by the idea that all paths lead to God, that there is no need for evangelism or urgency in sharing Christ's message of salvation. This growing trend within the church highlights the critical need for sound doctrine and a steadfast commitment to the truth of Scripture.
 
In these conversations, I learned the importance of both patience and persistence in sharing the gospel. Despite encountering opposition and misunderstanding, we must continue to present the truth with love and clarity, trusting that God will work in the hearts of those we reach. The reality of hell and the urgency of salvation through Jesus are not comfortable topics, but they are essential truths that we cannot afford to compromise. Also, the people who believe such things are not bad people, but they are people who need to hear and understand the truth. If you love someone you tell them the uncomfortable truth, the truth that contradicts “the beautiful lie.”
 
After this encounter and while considering the validity of universalism, several compelling questions arose about the early Christian martyrs and the teachings of Jesus Himself. If universalism were true, why would the disciples choose to endure horrific deaths rather than simply telling their persecutors, "Believe what you want, because you're all saved anyway"? These men, who lived with Jesus day and night, would have known the truth. When faced with beatings, imprisonment and death, why didn't they just declare that everyone was saved regardless of their lack of faith in Christ? “It’s ok everyone! You don’t really have to receive Jesus as savior or even believe in Him for that matter.”
 
The steadfastness of the disciples in proclaiming Jesus as the only way to salvation, even unto death, speaks volumes. For instance, Peter was crucified upside down, Paul was beheaded, and others were stoned, burned, or speared. They held firmly to their faith because they understood that salvation through Jesus was not optional but essential. Their willingness to suffer and die for this belief underscores the exclusivity of the gospel message.
 
Consider also the thief on the cross. When he said to Jesus, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom," Jesus responded, "Today you will be with me in paradise" (Luke 23:42-43). If universalism were true, why didn't Jesus say, "Today you will both be with me in paradise"? This specific response highlights the necessity of a personal faith in Christ for salvation.
 
Another example is Stephen, the first Christian martyr. As he was being stoned, he prayed, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit" and pleaded for forgiveness for his executioners (Acts 7:59-60). Stephen's unwavering testimony and his appeal to Jesus at the moment of death illustrate his firm belief in the necessity of faith in Christ, even in the face of death.
 
Paul's missionary journeys also provide insight. He tirelessly preached the gospel, often facing severe persecution. In his letter to the Romans, he expressed deep sorrow for his fellow Israelites who had not accepted Christ, saying, "I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my people" (Romans 9:2-3). If universalism were true, such anguish would be unnecessary, as Paul would have believed that all were saved regardless of their faith.
 
Additionally, consider the Great Commission given by Jesus: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you" (Matthew 28:19-20). If universalism were true, this command to evangelize and disciple would be redundant. The emphasis on spreading the gospel to all nations underscores the necessity of faith in Jesus for salvation.
 
Finally, the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) provides a stark contrast between the destinies of the faithful and the unrepentant. The rich man, in torment, pleads for relief and a warning to his family. Abraham’s response indicates a fixed chasm between the saved and the lost, underscoring the permanence of one’s eternal destiny based on their response to God’s message.
 
These examples collectively demonstrate that the early disciples, Jesus’ teachings, and the broader biblical narrative do not support the concept of universalism. Instead, they emphasize the necessity of faith in Jesus Christ as the exclusive means of salvation. The urgency and fervor with which the apostles preached, even in the face of death, affirm the critical importance of this message.
​
Over the years, I have encountered many believers who once firmly embraced the clear message of salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). However, some have since shifted toward a more inclusive and seemingly kinder belief system. In this book, I aim to demonstrate that God's plan of salvation is inherently loving and merciful, and there is no need for us to create an alternative. God's love is unwavering, even when His ways do not align with our own desires. He is sovereign, and His love is evident in His desire for all to be saved, as He clearly states in His Word.

For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. (John 3:16 NKJV)
9 Comments
WeWereTheJoySetBeforeHim
8/16/2024 08:08:20 am

Thank you,.. the truth of what you're saying is so clearly laid out in the Word that it's clear most are not reading it for themselves when they claim new age universal doctrines. Definitely a much needed reminder here that we need to take our duty seriously.

Reply
Tina Wurschmidt link
8/16/2024 09:51:46 am

So good Michael! And so very true. Thanks for writing this.

Reply
Jessica-rose
8/16/2024 11:07:20 am

I love how so much scripture points to this fact. I have so many people in my life that believe this way and it has given me encouragement and insight on how I can continue to stand! Bless you and your obedience Michael!!

Reply
Randall Hahn
8/16/2024 08:19:17 pm

A friend of mine, his dad, has just in the last couple of years began to believe in Universalism. When we all got together as his dad explained his new "truth", it was exactly the arguments your friend had. I would sit there while he talked and Holy Spirit would give me an answer. Every answer Holy Spirit gave me were exactly what you have pointed out here. My first point was that if Universalism was true then Jesus played a horrific cruel joke on His followers by telling them to "go and preach His gospel" knowing they would be tortured to death for no reason because everyone is saved no matter what. I said now that is not a loving God who would do that to His children. He had no answer but would not be swayed. As we continued with multiple conversations I finally learned he just couldn't believe his parents would burn in hell just because they didn't believe. I told him so your whole belief in Universalism is selfish. You see God as cruel for sending people to hell just because they didn't accept Jesus. I said well when you go before Him you can tell Him that and see what He says. I made it a point not to allow our discussions to get heated but prayed in the Spirit continually as we debated. He still believes he is right and I am cruel and don't care about people. I've told him, my ministry is to tell. It is Holy Spirit who convicts and convinces and if they reject Holy Spirit's pricking, that is the sin unto death. Like God, I wish no one to perish. I said don't get mad at me, take it up with Jesus. I said all this to say, I've never read your work or heard of you but what Holy Spirit revealed to you in answer to this false teaching, He also revealed to me, including the thief on the cross, the great divide Jesus spoke of, and the most " Universal" verse of all time. John 3:16. That little phrase "whosoever believeth " is the rock the Gospel of Jesus stands on.

Reply
Prince
8/20/2024 05:46:36 pm

Thank you!

Reply
Randall Hahn
8/20/2024 06:05:58 pm

Keep sharing the truth my brother

Reply
Joanna link
9/5/2024 05:43:02 pm

I will be rereading this and using it as notes in conversation with my universalist friends

Reply
Stephen
10/1/2024 04:34:46 pm

I would like to talk to you privately about this matter if you would be willing to do so.

Reply
Stephen
11/2/2024 04:33:55 am

What is interesting is that there are different types of universalism. Most Christians lump them together in one box, throw out the box, and are not willing to even engage on the topic.

One day while I was taking a walk in the countryside and having a long prayer time, the Lord said, 'Stephen, do you believe in Romans 10:9 that "if you confess Jesus is Lord you will be saved".' He then posed the question, 'Stephen, do you believe in Philippians 2:11 that "every tongue will confess me as Lord".' He then asked me to put those two verses together. "Hmm, that sounds like everyone gets saved!"

Because of my background teaching of hell being "Eternal Torment" I put it to one side in my journal. This sounded like "Too good to be true".

Clearly there seemed to be a lot of verses that contradicted this. As I opened up conversation with the Lord, I started looking at the contradictions with him. I had many passages which deeply seemed to contradict. For example, the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. But as I kept taking these back to the Lord, he would show me things about them. I have been constantly concerned about being deceived so kept on testing the spirits and each time, the spirits would confess Jesus came in the flesh (1 John 4:1).

Recently I discovered that 99% of the early church fathers believed in universalism. St Jerome, St. Gregory, Origen, St Clement, and the desert fathers. They believe in something called, "The restoration of all things" which is mentioned multiple times. The bible is littered with other verses suggesting that all will be saved and all will be restored. Here are some:

1 Tim 4:10, Ps 22:27, Lam 3:3, Col 1:2, Acts 3:21

The early church fathers did not have the word hell in their dictionary. A variety of words are used Sheol etc. The early church fathers believed the fire was a refining fire for a period of time, for those who didn't repent. God is a refining fire, an all consuming fire.

The early church fathers believed in this view, however, in the 6th century St Augustine, who lived 1700 miles away from the majority of the church fathers and didn't read greek, decided that the fire was a literal fire of "eternal torment", - he also believed unbaptized babies would go straight to roast in hell. He was working with the emporer Justinian. Justinian like this idea of eternal torment, because it could be used to control the masses. He summoned the 180 bishops. 160 didn't turn up and the pope was dragged across Europe. They were forced to sign a document making Universalism (*see below) a heresy. From that day onward the doctrine of "Eternal Torment" has prevailed and scriptures have been translated through that lens, and parables understood through that lens. Before this point Universalism was the norm.

Now there are different types of universalism:
1. Jesus is irrelevant, all paths lead to God, and everyone goes to heaven.
2. Jesus is very relevant, everyone goes to heaven and there is no need for an age of refining fire.
3. Jesus is very relevant, those who do not believe, will find themselves going through the refiner's fire for an age. At the end of this age, they will have been refined enough to willingly confess Jesus as Lord. "Jesus is the saviour to ALL, especially to those who believe." 1 Tim 4:10
4. This adds on to the previous version of Universalism and goes one step further, and says that "Every creature and created thing" will bow the knee, this includes fallen angels. "The fire of purification was prepared for the devil and his angels."
5. There are other variations of universalism.

What most of the early church believed in was option 3.

*Interestingly, when Justinian made universalism a heresy it wasn't even based on version 3, it was based on some of Origen's disciples who had adopted another universalistic doctrine.

Since the initial conversation during my walk, it has taken 4 years of constantly taking this back to the Lord. I have been sitting on the fence for all this time, and now find myself leaning towards option 3. If indeed the church has walked with wrong doctrine for 1400 years, it may take a while to undo bad thinking. Or if I am being led astray, then I trust the Lord will correct me. Yes, versions 1 and 2 of universalism throw out. But I am being more and more inclined to believe 3 as I sit and discuss it with Jesus.

I am open to conversation with Michael on this.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Michael
    van
    ​vlymen

    Sharing the super natural things of God..

    Archives

    December 2024
    August 2024
    August 2023
    May 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    September 2019
    August 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • EVENTS
  • BOOKS
    • Michael Van Vlymen Libros en Español
    • Michael Van Vlymen Livros em português
    • Michael Van Vlymen Livres en Français
    • Michael Van Vlymen Libri in italiano
    • Michael Van Vlymen Boeken in het Nederlands
    • マイケル・ヴァン・ヴライメン 日本語の本
    • Майкъл Ван Влаемен, Българската книга.
    • 迈克尔-范弗利门中文书籍
    • Other Books
    • VIDEO
  • Contact
    • TESTIMONIES
    • Blog
    • ABOUT US
  • GIVING